The author thinks that although it is top rated artificial Christmas trees, the natural Christmas trees is friendlier environmentally. At the present time, many people who have switched from a live Christmas tree into an artificial Christmas tree in an effort to become more environmentally friendly. But contrary to popular belief, artificial trees are usually even worse for the environment, and could take more than 20 years is used to offset the cost of ecology. Increasingly, people are trying to find an environmentally friendly alternative to almost everything.
Kill the tree so that we can display it in our home for several weeks can easily be interpreted as a pandemic environment , so people think that by switching to artificial trees , they help to save trees every year . Unfortunately, it's not that simple. A study conducted by the Canadian company's sustainable development, found that artificial tree produces carbon emissions of two - thirds more than real trees due to manufacturing and transportation. Apart from the obvious weakness of artificial trees must be concerned with the manufacture and delivery; there are many benefits to planting a real tree that can not be replicated by the artificial tree. Clean air is quite obvious, so we will only get one out of the way. Real Christmas trees are grown specifically for the purpose of being cut down, so by purchasing a artificial one , we do not save the life of the tree , we just cut the demand for real trees and thus the real number of trees to be planted in the future .
Furthermore, we replace top rated artificial Christmas trees with something to cut carbon emissions that increase them. In addition to creating cleaner air, this tree farms offer a habitat for many wild animals. It is also important to remember here that this habitat does not disappear every year. It can take up to a decade to grow a tree, so it's not a process that is very disturbing.
Popular Post This Week